tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post7164717959083620145..comments2024-03-25T20:40:44.806-04:00Comments on Literary Rejections on Display Now Has Long COVID: Close Positive RejectionWriter, Rejectedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17241982229214057815noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-36958270480910422532008-12-05T02:28:00.000-05:002008-12-05T02:28:00.000-05:00good eye, puc! indeed.good eye, puc! indeed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-70347679313823675442008-12-04T18:49:00.000-05:002008-12-04T18:49:00.000-05:00srry, i did not mean for my 'duh' thing to be so o...srry, i did not mean for my 'duh' thing to be so offhand...<BR/><BR/>i should have been clearer and said i would not feel very encouraged by that rejectionryan callhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520530093640135180noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-20461452515778286702008-12-04T15:21:00.000-05:002008-12-04T15:21:00.000-05:00Something else curious about the rejection - so wh...Something else curious about the rejection - so what about the NYT's contest?: But how many entries did the NYT's College Essay Contest get? Don't know, so looked it up. See below, from NYT's site:<BR/><BR/>In July, the magazine published "What's the Matter With College," an essay by the historian Rick Perlstein, online and invited college students to respond. Some 600 did. The winning essay and four runners-up appear below; you can search hundreds of additional entries using the tools in the righthand column of this page.<BR/><BR/>600. Narrative doesn't mention a number in their rejection. Why not? The rejection does say Narrative received four times the number the NYT's contest received, so 2,400. Not sure if that should make the rejectee feel better or not. Maybe the point of Narrative's rejection is that the writer might next time consider the NYT's rather than Narrative - certainly more transparent.<BR/><BR/>Rejectee's magazine uses "evident merit"? He/She works for the New Yorker?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-15037955469885040452008-12-04T14:21:00.000-05:002008-12-04T14:21:00.000-05:00I'm not sure how much a "better" class of rejectio...I'm not sure how much a "better" class of rejection note means. I just re-submit, and whatever class of rejection I've had -- and if I've re-submitted eight or a dozen times, I get both, assuming both are sent -- I've eventually gotten accepted at several places I simply never figured would take my stuff.<BR/><BR/>I think PixieCorpse has it right when she says Form A isn't much different from Form B without handwriting, but let's face it, even handwriting doesn't mean much unless it's on a check. <BR/><BR/>The point is to keep resubmitting. However, do not keep paying entry or reading fees.John Brucehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04625895756906828468noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-19383493156378575932008-12-04T13:55:00.000-05:002008-12-04T13:55:00.000-05:00A&C. It's Narrative, after all.rmellis, t...A&C. It's Narrative, after all.<BR/><BR/>rmellis, the magazine I worked at did indeed have two rejection slips, one generic and one encouraging. But I don't consider most of the ones that lack human handwriting very encouraging.<BR/><BR/>LaurelT. Laurel Sulfatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08402062885579362223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-42081379990702027322008-12-04T11:40:00.000-05:002008-12-04T11:40:00.000-05:00thanks everybody for weighing in. rmellis and ryan...thanks everybody for weighing in. <BR/><BR/>rmellis and ryan, the language of the last line of the first paragraph is what i found interesting. of course it's form, but i wondered if it was a higher kind of form. the magazine i work for has several (well, two) tiers of form letter: the regular one and then a form letter which incorporates the phrase "evident merit". i wondered if "positive attention" was a similar kind of phrase.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-22358348902871048412008-12-04T03:09:00.000-05:002008-12-04T03:09:00.000-05:00that is a form rejection, duhthat is a form rejection, duhryan callhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520530093640135180noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-46198783257829249272008-12-03T19:17:00.000-05:002008-12-03T19:17:00.000-05:00A. I got the same.While C is tempting to write in...A. I got the same.<BR/><BR/><BR/>While C is tempting to write in, this contest was free. Imagine that. . .free!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-55480641683102342452008-12-03T18:55:00.000-05:002008-12-03T18:55:00.000-05:00A & C. There's nothing in the note to sugg...A & C. There's nothing in the note to suggest they are commenting personally on your story. Sorry.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-29448468143009104502008-12-03T15:52:00.000-05:002008-12-03T15:52:00.000-05:00The sign it's a form rejection: nothing like "we w...The sign it's a form rejection: nothing like "we were really impressed with the scene where Jed flushes the hairball down the toilet." The editors who include little bits like that in their rejections really warm my heart. Sort of. Why not just accept the piece if the scene was that great?John Brucehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04625895756906828468noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-16331259039171807692008-12-03T15:45:00.000-05:002008-12-03T15:45:00.000-05:00Do editors of magazines really hand out different ...Do editors of magazines really hand out different levels of rejection slips? I've worked on a few mags, and I've only ever done the basic note, or the basic note with hand-written comments.<BR/><BR/>So yeah, I vote A and C.rmellishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03133206908895131438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-22017318405630381072008-12-03T12:54:00.000-05:002008-12-03T12:54:00.000-05:00A and C. Most def.A and C. Most def.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-70181607837614041552008-12-03T12:03:00.000-05:002008-12-03T12:03:00.000-05:00What a fun website. Wish I'd found it earlier! I'm...What a fun website. Wish I'd found it earlier! I'm throwing a huge funeral for my rejected novel on Saturday (see my website www.MyDreamIsDeadButImNot.com) I'll put a link to your site when I update mine. (I'm new at the web/blog thing). Thanks for this, look forward to reading in more detail. (PS: Using lovely stationary and a fine sense of humor, I invited my rejecters to be pallbearers and got a written scolding from one saying it made her *uncomfortable* tee hee).<BR/>Mary Patrick KavanaughAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-24817274503272496352008-12-03T11:38:00.000-05:002008-12-03T11:38:00.000-05:00Answer: A & C. Narrative 30 Below refers to th...Answer: A & C. Narrative 30 Below refers to the temperature in Hell at which an unsolicited entry will get published in Narrative.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-8727482271711444172008-12-03T11:20:00.000-05:002008-12-03T11:20:00.000-05:00I hate to say this, but I got the same message and...I hate to say this, but I got the same message and I didn't even enter the contest.vanderbilt44https://www.blogger.com/profile/08526414037334987901noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2703861414547309188.post-51698532079719177142008-12-03T10:43:00.000-05:002008-12-03T10:43:00.000-05:00Clearly A & C, keeping in mind Narrative's...Clearly A & C, keeping in mind Narrative's overall greed. While the rejection itself is sorta-kinda nice and reassuring, there's nothing in it to identify any particular work. It's a little like the slot machines that dribble you little winnings now and then to keep you feeding them. Again, those who pay entry fees to contests are playing a similar game.John Brucehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04625895756906828468noreply@blogger.com