Friday, March 12, 2010

Quarter Quarterly

Saw this posted on the interwebs.  I liked the quarter covering up the name of the review...because after all what possible difference could it humanly make which lit journal originated the tiniest of tiny rejections.  A forlorn John Woodington blogs about it nicely here

2 comments:

John Woodington said...

Thanks for picking this up. Isn't that tiny thing crazy? I have some other interesting rejections on my blog, which you might enjoy.

h said...

Dear ___ Review

Cut the pretense of environmental and budgetary consciousness. Just email a simple "no." What a waste of an envelope, stamp, ink, toner, and 1/20 of a piece of paper. When I send an SASE, I like to get my money's worth and receive a fatter rejection.