Tuesday, March 30, 2010

No Lice or Flies, etc.

Good Pesach, Rosemary Ahern.  May all the plagues pass you over.  (Talk about a moving story with drama and compelling characters. Plus who can ever resist a triumphant freeing of an entire people?)

Monday, March 29, 2010

We Will Love You and Hug You and Call You George


Here's another one brought to you by a loyal reader, who says "it's the best form rejection ever!" But you know how that goes, if they get you feeling warm and fuzzy and keep inviting you to submit, you will feel nice about their journal and that will fulfill the hope that "we may continue to read each other." Meaning, maybe you'll give a nice donation. Am I being too cynical? Is there such a thing? Probably. Here's the rejection: "We are honored that you considered our publication worthy to receive your writing, we thank you for the opportunity to read your work, and we regret that we are unable to publish it at this time. Please consider the numerical reality: that for the current issue, we were able to publish much less than one percent of the submissions we received. Because we were particularly fond of your submission, you will soon receive another email inviting you to submit different work for the next issue. We wish you the very best of luck, we hope you will keep in touch, and we hope that we may continue to read each other. Ever yours, The Editors of Contrary"

Friday, March 26, 2010

Reader, Can You Spare A Dime?

The handwritten note on this one says: "Some parts do show a mature style." It's signed by the ghostly "Reader" (my favorite). Jesus, really? That's all you got? That's what you can spare? Probably better to leave it as a form letter if you're going to be that stingy.  Maybe that's what you get when a publishing company calls itself the "Blah-Blah-Blah Corporation."  Remember the days when publishing companies seemed like cozy families: MacMillan & Sons, William Collins & Sons, G.P. Putnam's Sons, Harper & Row?  Well, all right, maybe that's a lot of sons, but you get my point. Media conglomerations (still mainly sons of bitches) do not a family make.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

High-Concept Memoir = Kafakaesque Nightmare, No?*

Here's from today's mailbag about a press release received by a newspaper editor:

Dear Writer, Rejected: Thanks for your blog, which I recently discovered. When I received the press release below — not once, but twice — I thought of LROD. I know nothing about this writer or his book, but I hope the misspellings in the release ("tiles and tribulations"?) are intentional somehow. Just for fun, I blogged about it and stuck in a shoutout to you here. Anyway, thanks again, and maybe I'll contribute a rejection (one of the ones I get, not the ones I give to people who mistakenly send our paper fiction) one of these days.
    Okay, take a deep breath, here comes the most amazing press release ever released into the wild (the subject line alone exhausts me):
From: "Jennifer Gorski" <jennifer.gorski@sourcebooks.com>
Date: March 15, 2010 2:40:49 PM EDT
To: ----
Subject: "Tearing Down The Walls" to Help Aspiring Writers get a Critique of Their Work from a Publisher, Because of Publish This Book 
Unbelievably, I was fed up with the byzantine quest of trying to get a book published. So, I (Stephen Markley) decided to cut to the chase and simply write a hyperkinetic, high-concept memoir about trying to publish a book — Publish This Book, (that book to be precise) out March 2010.



     So a big part of "Publish This Book" is about the maddening Kafka-esque nightmare of trying to break through as a writer in the cutthroat world of publishing. Writers spend months, years and decades crafting a manuscript and honing a book proposal, only to get the standard form rejection letter: "We're sorry, but this does not meet our needs at this time."
    Breaking down this wall between the writer and the industry is the idea behind a new promotion by my publisher, Sourcebooks. And yes, as soon as I describe this idea to you, it will sound as if these people have all lost their minds, but Seven Days readers will benefit from! Here's the gist to the “Tearing Down The Walls” promotion:
    You have a novel or a non-fiction book proposal, right? Well all you have to do is buy a copy of "Publish This Book" (because they are not doing this solely out of the goodness of their hearts), and send in the receipt or order confirmation along with your proposal. Then, in a few months (depending on how many people take them up on this), you will get back a critique written by a Sourcebooks editor or my agent, Julie. The promotion is set to run through May 9th (so get cracking).
    Some ground rules:
  • A proposal includes a one-page synopsis of your book, along with up to 5,000 words of your manuscript
  • Submissions can be sent to ptbsubmissions@sourcebooks.com or you can go here for the submission form on Sourcebooks' website (all rules are found here!)
  • This in no way guarantees you a book contract, but trust me when I say that getting any kind of feedback, advice, and/or words of encouragement from the Stalinistic publishing world is an awesome opportunity for any aspiring writer and something I would have given organs for a couple of years ago when I was struggling to find a publisher or agent to look at my book 








Again I repeat… getting someone in publishing to respond to your manuscript, now a days is a very big deal and an opportunity I know I would have jumped all over back when I was banging my head against the wall trying to get something published.
     Believe me, I'm on your side when I say that Julie, Sourcebooks and my editor Peter are all insane for taking this on. I told them as much in a recent meeting -- that they have essentially opened themselves up to critiquing every Twilight rip-off and right-wing crank's manifesto (my dad is already madly preparing his!) in all of North America. 
    So help aspiring writers in your area know about this opportunity by talking about this. Don't waste this chance: tell people to buy a copy, prep their own books and deluge my publisher. If you would like a copy of my book to review or want to talk with me, please contact Jennifer Gorski know,Jennifer.gorski@sourcebooks.com or 630.536.0542.
---
 Stephen Markley
Author of PUBLISH THIS BOOK, out spring 2010 from Sourcebooks
No More Form Letters!
The Publish This Book “Tearing Down the Walls” Promotion
So you work on your manuscript for months, carefully craft a proposal and pitch letter, and send out your heart and soul to agents and publishers. And what do you get in return? A form letter saying “Thank you for your submission, but it does not meet our needs at this time.” Really? 
We at Sourcebooks and Julie A. Hill and Associates know how you feel. Well, now we know, thanks to Stephen Markley and his hilarious, innovative, and amazing new memoir Publish This Book. You see, sick of getting rejections that say nothing, Stephen decided to cut to the chase and write a memoir about how hard it is to get a book published. And then try to get that book published—a book about its own creation.
Crazy, right? Well, he convinced us, getting agent representation from Julie Hill of Julie A. Hill and Associates and finally publication by Sourcebooks. And after reading his whole manuscript, we see how hard it is for you out there. So in honor of Stephen’s achievement, and all aspiring writers, we’ve decided to tear down the walls that keep writers from honest and helpful feedback about their work from the publishing industry. That means: no more form letters, but an actual critique of your submission from an agent or publishing company 








How Does It Work?
1. Purchase a copy of Publish This Book.
2. Between March 1 and May 9 submit your proposal along with a proof of purchase (receipt order confirmation, etc.) at  www.Sourcebooks.comwww.sourcebooks.com/promos/ptbsubmissionsby email to ptbsubmissions@sourcebooks.com or by mail:
Sourcebooks, Inc.
Att: “Tearing Down the Walls” Promotion
1935 Brookdale Rd, suite 139
NapervilleIL 60563
3.      Wait 2-6 months (While you’re waiting, why not read your new copy of Publish This Book? It’s amazing.)
4.      Receive a 2-4 paragraph critique of your submission.
The Rules
·         What You Can Submit for Critique: your submission may include a one-page synopsis of your work and a sample chapter not to exceed 5,000 words, on which the critique will be based.
·         You may include additional biographical, marketing, competitive title analysis, or other information as you desire, but we only guarantee to read and critique the synopsis and sample chapter. HOWEVER, YOU MAY NOT SUBMIT MORE THAN 5,000 WORDS OF THE ACTUAL MANUSCRIPT.
·         Submissions must be entered on the website between March 9 and May 9. No earlier or later submission will be accepted.
·         Participation in this promotion guarantees you a critique and a critique only. In no way should you expect your submission to be under consideration for publication—please follow normal submission procedures for such requests.
 The Questions
Q: So, if you like my submission you’ll represent my book, right?
A: No. As above, participation in this promotion guarantees you a critique and a critique only. However, we reserve the right to invite any participant to later submit their work under our official submission processes.
Q: Why do I have to wait so long for my critique?
A: It takes time to read submissions and write a critique. The reason most agents and publishers send form rejection letters is simply that we receive thousands of submissions each year, and if we were to write critiques for each one, we’d never do anything else (including sleeping). So, for this promotion we’re taking on the challenge of writing all those critiques, but if submissions flood in we’ll need time to respond to everyone properly.
Q: Why do I have to buy this guy Stephen’s Markley’s book?
A: As hard as it is to get published, it’s just as hard to break through as a first-time author. And here’s the thing: Publish This Book is really good, and we think aspiring writers especially will love it. So, we came up with this idea as a bit of a win-win: you get the chance to break through the “form letter wall” and we can increase the chance that people will read, love, and spread the word about Stephen’s book.
Q: Are you going to be mean about my submission?
A: No, we would never be mean. However, it is important to note that our guarantee to critique your work is not a guarantee to like your work. We may just love the work, and that will be great. But our critique may provide feedback that isn’t what you were hoping to hear. Or it may be a bit of both. Just know that in any case, all feedback and criticism will be constructive.
Q: You’re really doing this? Are you crazy?
A: We may be. We may end up digging out of a mountain of paper for months to come. But if it means more people read Publish This Book and spread the word about how great it is, we’re more than happy to make that happen.
Sincerely,
Julie Hill, Julie A. Hill and Associates
and Peter Lynch, Sourcebooks, Inc.
 Publish This Book: “[A] sprawling, self-referential account of [Markley’s] efforts to sell a book about his efforts to sell the book he’s writing at that very moment… compelling, emotionally resonant passages.” - Publishers Weekly
Fed up with the Byzantine quest of trying to get a book published, Stephen Markley decides to cut to the chase and simply write a hyperkinetic, high-concept memoir about trying to publish a book — Publish This Book (this book to be precise) , out this March 2010.
As Markley begins his project to write a book about himself trying to publish a book, he also starts to fill the pages with a catalogue of everything that has happenedin the process. What he does not realize is that “Life” will come to intrude on the narrative in ways he could never have foreseen. His best friend reveals that he is about to unexpectedly become a father. The girl he loves makes an abrupt exit from his life. Something bad happens with the economy or something (did anyone hear about this?). And against all odds, he actually finds an agent for his wild, uninhibited manuscript, making the whole thing terrifyingly real.
    This is the modern day saga of a plugged-in, hyped-up, idealistic, ambitious, arrogant, audacious, unyielding young writer, who's tired of waiting his turn. Like any work that claims gleefully and irreverently to be about nothing, it's really about pretty much everything—from the pitfalls of narrating your life as it unfolds to those tumultuous early years of adulthood when the promise of youth still holds the capacity to inspire awe. This is a story of tiles and tribulations— follow along with Markley as he tries to find his true voice within his work and in life.
    “With such enormous talent, [author] does not hide his flaws and vulnerabilities. He acknowledges his weaknesses, embraces them, and uses this self awareness to boldly drive toward his dream… this book should be enjoyed in a place where it is socially acceptable to laugh in wild bursts, maybe even cry a little, and cheer on a rising star.” - Hilary Blanchard
    Out NOWPublish This Book is not only a comical page-turner, but also one man’s true story on how to overcome rejection and still maintain the desire to pursue important goals while combating life’s greatest challenges.





Publish This Book
Stephen Markley
March 2010, Sourcebooks
978-14022-2935-0; 480pgs; $14.99 US / $17.99 CAN; Memoir, Humor; Trade Paper





Jennifer Gorski
Senior Publicist,  Sourcebooks
O:  630.961.3900 ext. 242
D: 630.536.0542
1935 Brookdale Road, Suite 139
NapervilleIL 60563
*Pictures added by me.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Enterprising Copyright Infringement

Over at the on-demand print co, Cafe Press, someone named "Angry Writer" has created a series of items for sale with the phrase "I Collect Rejection Letters."  For instance you can get a mouse pad, a t-shirt, pillows, notebooks, framed tiles, teddy bears, or even a gross of magnets, envelope seals, note cards and stickers.  (Also sweatshirts, jerseys, hoodies, baby onesies and so much more!) Way to merchandise.  Oh well, you snooze, you lose.  Loser: that would be me.  Hey, wait...AW didn't include mugs; maybe I can still corner that marker. (Problem: I don't think I could be that cheesy if I tried.)

Monday, March 22, 2010

Are We On a First Name Basis?

Here's a real heartbreaker that came today in this morning's email:

"Dear [First Name of Writer]: 
    Thank you for the opportunity to consider your manuscript for publication by ChiZine Publications. We enjoyed reading your novel, but, after careful consideration, we regretfully advise that we are unable to accept it for publication.
    This is one of the saddest rejection letters I’ve had to write because I really enjoyed your novel. I thought it was funny, engaging, and well written. I don’t even have any substantive criticism to give you because, yeah, it works. I just don’t think it fits with the profile of the material we’re trying to publish right now. It’s not you, it’s us. I do hope this finds a print publisher because I’d like to read the final version.
    Your interest in our press is genuinely appreciated, and we wish you the best for your ongoing writing endeavours.
                                                Sincerely, Helen Marshall

It really is them, isn't it? Oh, Helen, Helen, Helen: What a sad, sad world this is.

Friday, March 19, 2010

Have a Fantastic Rejection

Hey There [Nickname of Writer]*,
    Thanks so much for sending your story [Name of Story] along to Writers' Bloc. Unfortunately, I don't think we can use this piece for our magazine, but I did enjoy reading it. You write well. It's just that we're always inundated with submissions, which makes it hard to get published here—and also we get lots and lots of pieces about [Topic of Story], which makes it ever harder. I hope you understand. Feel free to submit to us again sometime, and good luck placing your story in another market. Have a fantastic week!
    Warm regards, 
    Kevin Dickinson, Editor
    www.writersblocmag.org

*Sent in via email: writerrejected [at] aol [dot] com.  Do you have a similarly snappy rejection you'd like to post anonymously?  Why not send it in?

Thursday, March 18, 2010

One Word Is All It Takes

A friend of mine told me on the phone yesterday about the best rejection he ever received; I made him swear he was going to send it to me via e, but I should have made him triple swear. He said it was from a literary magazine, and would look to see which one, but here's what it said: "Nope." Just a single colloquialism. Have you ever?  I do not even really mean that rhetorically: have you ever gotten such a decisive turn down? Personally, I think it's rude.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Alaska Says No...Sort Of

You have to really search this one for the embedded rejection. Your name is not on the list, so you're out, I guess. What do you guys think of residencies? Have we ever discussed?  I've been to two: MacDowell and Cummington (back in the day).  Loved them. You?

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

You Can't Always Get What You Give

I got a gracious note from our friend, Mr. J. Appel, who kindly promises to bequeath me his vast rejection collection some day. Betsy Lerner offered scotch; I like her style. But no gifts are necessary; there's reward enough in getting a crack at sending our guy over the wall. I also requested a report from the other side when the deed is done. Let's all say a collective prayer for Jacob Appel's short-story collection success. You got to give it away, mice, to see it come back. And if luck never goes your way, if you never get it back, at least you did a mitzvah for some good guy who deserves a publishing break as much as the next writer. Cheer him on!

Monday, March 15, 2010

We Long to Believe Again

Not only did Jacob Appel win first prize in this contest, but he was also a runner-up. How, oh how, does the man do it? And why doesn't somebody collect these award-winning gems and sell them?  How about you, Ms. Betsy Lerner?  You read this blog (or at least you list it on your awesome blog, The Forest For the Trees).  Please solicit the man and be our hero. Restore our faith in the system, in fiction, in the benevolent gods.  Even if short stories are the kiss of death, maybe Appel is the next Alice Munro, minus that more reasonable country, Canada...but still. He makes me wish I were a better (third-gendered) wo/man and that I still wrote short stories, but two collections are enough for me.  Besides, I have turned my eyes toward the lucrative goddess, nonfiction, of the creative variety.

Friday, March 12, 2010

Quarter Quarterly

Saw this posted on the interwebs.  I liked the quarter covering up the name of the review...because after all what possible difference could it humanly make which lit journal originated the tiniest of tiny rejections.  A forlorn John Woodington blogs about it nicely here

Thursday, March 11, 2010

To Download or Not to Download

So, I've been asked to write a review of two novels for a nice, fancy magazine.  I've decided to read one of them the old fashioned way (a galley) and one of them on my eReader (Kindle) just to see if I can find any qualitative difference in the experience.  For the most part, the old fashioned way is much more pleasant because it's familiar and brings back happy memories.  It doesn't help at all that the stupid Kindle keeps freezing, and I have to dig through a drawer to find a paperclip, pull it apart and jam it in the reset hole...like, every ten pages.  I finally figured out if I kept it super-charged and dumped some of the older ebooks off the thing, to free up the memory, it wouldn't freeze quite as often.  That seemed to help, though it still crashes.
    In truth, though, the novel I'm reading on the eReader has a much bigger scope and tackles more compelling questions on the whole than the book I read on paper, which is to say, it's still the story, the sweeping away of reality, the feeling of being an outsider on page one and slowly sinking into the middle of a new world, that wins the day. (Maybe I jumped the gun when I proclaimed fiction dead. Maybe it's the old way of selling books that's dead; writing them beautifully persists. Maybe the industry will just have to adjust, the way the music industry did.  It's too bad that writers can't go on world tours the way rock stars can to recoup the loss in book/CD sales, now downloadable on the cheap.)
     From this reader's library chair, the form of the book is fairly neutral; perhaps one is slightly more annoying and the other more pleasurably familiar, but still a book is a book is a book is an ebook.
    Electronic books tip the scales slightly for me: a smaller impact on the environment and the wallet, though I realize this is what's killing the business as we know it.  Maybe it's time for the beast to die and rise up as something more reasonable. God knows the blockbuster model has done nothing for me. I am confirmed in my opinion that the bookness of the experience comes through without the paper.
    The world is a-changing, mice.  Think of that.  We are in the middle of the seachange, some of us swimming with the tide; some of us against. That's my report anyway. The extra good news is that both books were very successful, enjoyable, and well done. One of them even seems important.

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Missouri Review Invitation/Non-Invitation


An LROD reader wants us to do an analysis of the following two rejections from Missouri Review, both currently being sent out as form letters:

1) Thank you for submitting [story name] to The Missouri Review. Though it doesn't meet our current needs, we appreciate the opportunity to consider it for publication. We wish you the best of luck in placing it elsewhere. Sincerely, The Editors

2) Thank you for giving us the chance to consider [story name] for publication in The Missouri Review. Though it does not fit our current needs, we appreciate your interest in our magazine and your commitment to quality writing. We wish you the best of luck publishing your work and hope you’ll consider sending us more in the future. Sincerely, The Editors


Our friend's friend received form letter #1 and our friend received form letter #2. I'd say that they tier their rejections at MR, wouldn't you?