As someone who has been writing letters of rejection 30 or 40 times a day for more than 35 years, I have considerable sympathy for my friend the writer-and an appreciation for the dilemma of "the editor," someone compelled to reject far more often than accept and to manage relationships with writers that are wildly lopsided. The editor has almost obscenely exaggerated power, since the ratio of candidates to published stories is so enormous (at least 1,000 to 1 at the Atlantic Monthly) and the writer's emotional stake in acceptance or rejection is so huge.He parses out the meaning of different rejections, and offers some insight, probably nothing you don't already know. Still, a helpful read.
Search This Blog
Monday, July 21, 2014
Editor of the Atlantic Monthly on Rejection
Remember this guy (who is NOT my father)? He wrote an essay titled "How to Read a Rejection," which on the whole is very interesting. You can read it here. Consider his words of wisdom on the power dynamics involved in rejection:
Saturday, July 19, 2014
Joan Didion Rejections
Smoke in your face and an avalanche of rejections for a Joan Didion story circa 1965:
Saturday Evening Post:
Many of us read it and a great many were excited and insistent in their admiration of it. Others, and they include Bill Emerson who has the final vote, also admired it but felt that it was wrong for the Post, not so much because of its subject matter, but also because of the oblique method of narration.
The New Yorker:
As a whole it just isn’t effective enough.
Ladies’ Home Journal:
Too negative for us.
McCall’s:
I feel very bad about rejecting this story — not because I think it’s really a well worked-out story but because the writing is so awfully good. She has a very special way of involving the reader… but I’m turning this down, reluctantly, because I don’t think it’s a successful story in the end.
Redbook:
Just too brittle.
Harper’s Bazaar:
While “The Wellfare Island Ferry” is almost my favorite among the stories we have published… I feel that “When Did Music Come this Way?” is not quite as good.
Vogue:
Not quite right for us.
Mademoiselle:
Unable to use this particular story.
The Atlantic Monthly:
I hope you’ll be sending us more of Joan Didion’s work, but this didn’t make it, so back to you.
The Reporter:
Alas, not right for The Reporter.
Cosmopolitan:
Too depressing.
Good Housekeeping:
Via: Brainpicker.com whose magnitude for reading and writing interesting blog posts seems endless. Thank you. (Plus to be totally transparent, this is also a pick up of the cool yellow Brainpicker quotation marks, with which I am now officially in love.)Marvelously written, very real, and so utterly depressing that I’m going to sit under a cloud of angst and gloom all afternoon… I’m sorry we are seldom inclined to give our readers this bad a time.
p.s. Interesting to see what the respectable magazine rounds for a story were in 1965.
Thursday, July 17, 2014
Hunter S. Thompson Goes B*t S***t on Biographer
Does it count as a rejection if the author lambasts his biographer? Here is a charming little hand-jotted note from Hunter S. to William McKeen who wrote Outlaw Journalist: The Life and Times of Hunter S. Thompson. Guess he didn't like the book.
Via: Flavorwire.
Via: Flavorwire.
Wednesday, July 16, 2014
Rejection Written to Ursula Le Guin's Agent
Here's a good one to Virginia Kidd, famous sci-fi lit agent, from an editor who found Le Guin a bit complicated. Love the line: "The interim legends become so much of a nuisance despite their relevance."
Thursday, July 10, 2014
T.S. Eliot rejecting Orwel's Animal Farm
Eliot worked for Faber and Faber at the time. He rejected the book, indicating that he thought Orwell's satire was off. He expressed it in this mind-boggling way:
"After all, your pigs are far more intelligent than the other animals, and therefore are the best qualified to run the farm -- in fact there couldn't have been an Animal Farm without them: so that what was needed (someone might argue) was not more communism but more public-spirited pigs."Is he defending Stalin here? And wouldn't a more "public-spirited" pig be a communist pig? Not sure I get it, but I'm not as smart as all that anyway.
Via:cracked.com
Monday, July 7, 2014
You Are TOO Dumb to Work Here
Is this the nightmare-iest HR executive return application letter ever? Can you imagine applying for a job at Trader Joe's and getting this horror show back as your rejection letter? I mean, maybe the poor, young applicant seriously dodged a bullet by missing this hiring opportunity by this sadistic individual. I mean, a lesson to young person is one thing, a humiliation is quite another. Am I wrong?
Thursday, July 3, 2014
Satan Doesn't Want Your 200 Clams?
So, what exactly happens when the church of satan rejects you? Do you go straight to heaven? Just wondering, yo. I know this isn't strictly literary, but there does seem to be something poetic going on here, right?
Wednesday, July 2, 2014
Houghton Mifflin Cannot Read Your Tome
Here's a good trick to avoiding rejection that stings: send a manuscript no one can read! I mean, it's a thought.
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
Our Very Own New Yorker Addicts Preferred
Here's an argument for how it's all about who you know. The New Yorker will hire its very own internal cocaine junkies, thank you very much.
Monday, June 30, 2014
The Press and Other Calamities
Since last we got together, mice, a few seminal things have happened. I was profiled in the New York Times, though not for my writing, which was mentioned briefly as my profession. And all my trying and angling and scraping did not get the interviewer to mention my forthcoming novel. It would have been so great, and at the same time, it points out how much of a wheedler and whore one becomes when about to get published--or I should say what a wheedler and whore I have become. Case in point: twittering so that I can have "a platform" for selling my book. I mean, who am I? What have I become? It seems to me that it would be better for my mental and emotional health to understand that whatever happens when the novel is published is truly out of my grasp. And yet, sitting as an innocent bystander, and watching it all go down, feels pretty terrible too. So what's a writer to do? Another thing happened: a big name literary star who offered to blurb my book did not receive it though it was sent to her in the mail, and now she is on summer vacation and not going to work, so not going to read my novel and blurb it. But as she says: "Congrats anyway!" Right? Ah, mice, these are very minor bumps in the road to publication. There are bound to be more, and it would behoove me to focus on what's important here. A manuscript that I shepherded around for a decade and a half is going to become a book, which will get some kind of review attention, I would presume, and which will sit on a couple of library shelves for a while, and get read (if I'm lucky) by a few hundred people, and then it will rest comfortable in my heart and in the world as basically a done deal. Hmm. When I/you put it that way, it hardly seems worth the effort and pain, does it, or does it? Moot point, since it's what we do. I estimate that about 0.99% of us will have some publishing experience other than (more glorious?) the one described here, but that isn't likely going to be me. Ever. So, I will move it along and write the next book, which is taking a long time, because I have to work as a (paid) writer to make a living, and also I am traumatized by all this, which isn't a very flattering public disclosure, but it is true. Seriously, mice, I speak the truth. I am among the walking wounded: we overly sensitive sorts, we writers. And yet I think of myself as one of those ancient indestructible beetles with the head of a rhinoceros, on which you could drop a building, and the thing will still keep crawling toward water. For today, anyway, that is my dim take on the matter. Tomorrow, I will be excited and hopeful again, because that's just how it is to be me.
Thursday, June 19, 2014
How You Can Make Money & Still Get Your Book Read
Here's something new in book publishing from Unglue.It: Crowdfunded ebooks become copyright-free once they’ve reached their target. This crowdfunding platform allows authors to charge for their ebooks until they’re satisfied with the profits earned and can release them happily into the public domain. There are three models for this:
Authors release their work for free and ask for support from readers and fans
Authors ask readers and fans to pledge towards the creation of an unfinished book
Authors with a finished work can set a funding target, after which the work will be released copyright free for everyone to read
Check out the cool mission/definitions at the top of the Unglue.It page.
Thursday, June 5, 2014
What To Do About Amazon?
A lot of writers seem to be silent on the topic of Amazon's alleged backhanded business practices to handicap sales of Hachette books. There is a deafening roar of non-response, especially among those who are about to have a book published soon, such as myself. But, I'll tell you mice. Fair is fair. I have to go with Stephen Colbert on this one. That might be dumb, since he is after all a Hachette author, and I am after all a nobody about to publish my book, but I've heard the beef of even teeny tiny publishers. What do you think? Comment anonymously, of course.
Friday, May 30, 2014
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
One Man Guy by Michael Barakiva
Michael's book title spells OMG and it is released today! Here's what he wants you to know about his victory over rejection:
Joy
Peskin and I were classic friends-of-friends: we had known each other since
Vassar, through my ex-girlfriend/her best friend Linsay, but had never hung out
one-on-one. We were two close planets
that orbited around the same star, whose paths would occasionally sync up (hey
– I can see Mars in the horizon!) but never really intersect. She was sharp and smart and sarcastic, and
could blend high-brow (Phi Beta Kappa) and low-brow (talk show fan) in a way
that I always admired. She was also fun
and pretty and self-effacing, and dated guys who were metro in a way I always
wanted to be but never quite could figure out how.
“You should write me a gay young
adult novel. That genre is really
growing,” Joy said to me off-handedly,
at one of Linsay’s functions, around ten years ago.
I didn’t know enough about Joy’s
professional life to be impressed about her accomplishments. All I really knew was that she was an editor,
she worked at Viking (then), and that she’d set me up on a totally unsuccessful
blind date with a fellow editor who at the time was not a fancy published YA author
but just the guy who made our mutual friend Linsay a CD of the musical Buffy
episode while she was in the hospital (I still can’t quite imagine a better
reason for going on a date with someone.)
I was not a writer. I didn’t think of myself as a writer. I was a theater director. I had trained as a theater director my whole
life. I’d never shown any promise as a
writer (Stacey Miness beat me out for editor-in-chief of the high school paper
my senior year, even though her AP Chem class meant she’d only be able to take
Journalism class every other day).
I thought about it for a while. Then I started writing. The year was 2005.
I started writing blindly, awkwardly
and clumsily, a new-born infant who would’ve undoubtedly perished by itself in
the wild. I didn’t have an outline. I didn’t do any research. I’d just drag my laptop to a Starbucks (this
was when NYC Starbucks were still designed as places to hang out all day), pop
it open and punch away furiously until I was spent. My writing was terrible.
I’d email every fifty pages or so to
Joy. She’d always read them quickly
(much more quickly than I read scripts sent to me, or than theaters read
scripts that I send to them), and respond with a few, brilliant notes. I’d re-write those pages and send them back
to Joy.
We worked this way for two years, at
the end of which, we had a book. Over
the course of those years, two dear mentor/friends (both writers) passed away,
I dated and was dumped by the guy I though I might spend the rest of my life
with, and I moved into a 8’x6’ room in Hell’s Kitchen large enough for either a
bed or desk (I chose the latter). Given
how my life was going, I wasn’t surprised when Viking rejected the book after
sitting on the manuscript for almost a year.
Joy set me up with an agent (the gentlemanly Josh Adams, whom I am proud to
say still represents me), who sent the manuscript to lots of other publishing
houses. They all responded with
courteous rejection notes. Some were
more courteous than others. Aforementioned
blind-date then-editor/now-fancy-author wrote an especially kind rejection
letter, which I appreciated given how terrible our date was.
Fast-forward five years.
I started on another book, this one
an experiment in collaboration, as I was co-writing with two friends (who have
even less writing experience that I do). I was supporting myself as a theater director, making plays that I love
and am proud of. I was dating a
wonderful man, who would soon become my husband. The month was April. The year was 2012.
My then-boyfriend/now-husband and I
were in Mexico, taking an unplanned trip for one of the saddest reasons to do
such a thing: his father has just passed away.
We attended the service, and I found a sliver joy in being able to be
there for Rafael the way he has been there for me so many times. The next day I got a call from my agent.
For reasons never quite articulated
to me, Josh Adams from Adams Literary hadn’t dropped me in five years though
the closest I’d come to producing another product was outlining a
seven-book fantasy YA series of which I never wrote one word.
My agent Josh speaks slowly and
deliberately. He tells me that Joy has
moved to Macmillan (I’m pretty sure I didn’t know this – maybe Linsay mentioned
it to me in passing?). He says that Joy
had requested our five-year old version of The Suburbs Suck (then
title). He says that Joy has finished
re-reading that manuscript and would like me to meet with her. Would I be interested?
Would I be interested.
I have my agent email me the
manuscript (even if I weren’t in Mexico, I’m pretty sure that I couldn’t locate
a copy of it at this point, five years and three laptops later). I print it up on Rafael’s mom’s printer. I read it in the office in her house, on the
outskirts of Mexico City, close to the University.
It’s somewhere between “not great”
and “pretty bad”. The dialogue is formal
and forced. The B plot is populated by
characters striving for their second dimension. And the sentences are constructed more shoddily than most modern
buildings in China.
And yet…through the clumsy
descriptions and awkward maneuverings, I can see what the book wants to
be. I feel like I’m in one of those
movies where we can enter the character’s imagination, and in his/her POV we
can see how s/he’d fix the family store up with a million dollars, or what
they’d build on the empty lot if someone just believed in them. If you build it, they will come. Go, Grease Lightning, go go go go go go go go
go.
I return to the States. I visit Joy in her new office in the Flatiron
building. I am talking about everything I
like in the book as it stands (the protagonist, the love interest, the best
friend). I talk about everything I’d
want to change – the family characters, the reveal of the brother’s girlfriend,
the beginning, the middle, the end. Joy,
as always, listens with great attention and responds with insights that are
mind-blowing. We come up with a
game-plan of what to change in the book. I’d say that about 15% of the text in the book that will be published
under the titled One Man Guy came from that original manuscript.
But here’s where it gets
interesting. Joy gives me two
offers. One: she can try to sell the
book as it is, before I make any changes.
We’ve already worked on it for two years, and she hates asking me to do
more on spec. But on the other hand, Joy
tells me she’s not sure this will work.
Two: I can re-write the first fifty pages, and she can use those to sell
the whole book. Joy is obviously more
interested in option #2. She wants to
see if I’ve actually developed the chops, over the last few years of co-writing
a play and starting a new book to execute the changes we’re talking about.
For me, the idea of working on this
thing more, on spec, is incredibly daunting.
And the poker player in me wants to take the risk on Option #1. That same poker player tells me that Joy is
bluffing – that in her fancy new position in her fancy new office, she can
muscle my terrible draft through.
The decision, ultimately, had
nothing to do with any of these factors.
It had to do with this: I didn’t want anyone reading the bad
manuscript. My name was on it. Artists are their own brand. And I could do better.
I ended up re-writing the first
sixty pages, ten more than had been asked, because that’s where the natural
break happens. These sixty pages
comprise what I think of as the first act of One Man Guy (the book, like
many movies and early 20th century plays, uses a three-act
structure). I hadn’t solved, at that
point, many of the challenges of the rest of the book, but I felt proud of
those pages in a way I never had about the book in its earlier
incarnations. I submit the pages.
The mysterious weekly meeting where
editors pitch books and writers’ dreams are made or shattered was
postponed. Then the next one was
cancelled, and some holiday got in the way of the third. A month later, I received one of the best
calls I’ve ever gotten from Joy. I was
in a restaurant on 9th Avenue, having bid goodbye to a friend’s
friends visiting from London. These
friends were fancy, Tony-Award-winner types, and I remember how much I wished
I had received the call before they’d left for their flights, so I would have
something to brag about. One day, I
hope to transcend such insecurities and pettiness.
Joy and I continued working much as
we had before. We’d talk, I’d write, I’d
send, she’d read, she’d comment, I’d rewrite. Joy had always been great in her job, but she was even better now. She knew how and when to ask questions, when
to push and challenge, when to let me find my way. It’s inconceivable to imagine that the book
would exist in any form without her. When I work with playwrights in the theater now, I’m better at it
because of what I learned from working with Joy.
I’m sure Joy knew hundreds of
writers who were better writers than me. To this day, I’m not entirely sure why she asked me to write something
for her all those years ago, and why she chose to revisit One Man Guy
all those years later. But through it
all, she believed in this book, and she believed in me.
When I think of the people we want
to work with (something that as a theater director I do often), I think of
their talent, their strengths, their experience, how fun they are. But now, I think about how much they believe
in me, and I in them. Because of
Joy.
Friday, May 23, 2014
Time To Let Go (For Real This Time)
There's a certain fellow, whom I like to call Mini Freud, who is the current guide of my psyche, who likens these crazy agency work teams (you know the set up: account people, traffic people, editors, and art directors) to my family of origin. The crazier they behave, the more at home I feel, says Mini Freud. And probably he is correct. But I am busting out. You know why? I don't need money THAT desperately. I've been at this for nearly 20 years, so I can actually sit back a little and choose which projects to take and which to let pass by my front stoop. (This time of year, I do generally use my front porch as my office.) That's right, my friends, at this late date, W,R is finally giving up the panic about ever really making a living as a writer (technical/promotional writing almost counts as writing, doesn't it?) because I've been making a living for some time now, and I might as well catch up to this fact, and chill out a little. Our little W,R is growing up at last.
But there is something else too. There is something big I have put off until the last minute, as my deadline is June. I have put off the final write up for the publisher of all the proof changes, final tinkerings, and last minute catches to my novel that will finalize the published version you will see on November 11, 2014. What it means, mice, is that this is truly it. End of the line. It as in IT, no more time on the meter. I will no longer have this novel all to myself any more. I will no longer have the opportunity to change any word, any punctuation, any character name, any anything I see fit to change in that leisurely "no-one's-going-to-buy-this-book" way. I will not be able to make it better after this, cannot think of some cool thing to try out, cannot let it rest in its little word document file while we take a break. I must let it go, and I must do so now.
Though I have longed for this moment of sending it off into the world for many years, as you have witnessed through this blog, it feels like I am ripping out the inner lining of my lungs. (Sorry to be so dramatic; I am tempted to ignore the feeling and wheeze out a statement about everything being fine, but I tend to get in trouble when I allow myself to be the Queen of Denial, as they say.) So, I have cleared away nearly entire the day (except for a brochure on multiple sclerosis that needs to be rewritten) for this task, and maybe for a few melodramatic tears.
Luckily, too, I think I have finally nailed the right approach for the nonfiction book I have been writing (fist-fight, more like) for the past couple of years, so I better get on with the new book (draft #4) and start this whole bruising book-readying cycle all over again. Why do we do it? I ask you and you ask me. There is no answer to that question other than, I suppose, because we can't not.
Happy Friday, ya'll. And Happy Memorial Day Weekend, Rosemary Ahern.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















