Search This Blog

Friday, April 4, 2008

Sexy Librarian by Julia Weist

When did you start writing the book? I began writing Sexy Librarian in the summer of 2006, when I was traveling cross-country visiting public libraries for an art project I was working on. When I began the manuscript, I had no serious expectations for it to be published; my intention was to collect rejection letters from commercial publishing houses. I displayed these letters as art works within an exhibition about failed literature.

Did you use an agent?/How long did it take to find a publisher? I submitted the unagented manuscript for Sexy Librarian to six publishing houses: Harlequin, Tor, Avon, Dorchester, Moonlit Romance, and Triskelion. Each passed and notified me of their decision with standard form letters. Ellen Lupton, a curator, saw the rejection letters in my exhibition and offered to publish the book independently. She hadn't read any content when she made the offer, but was interested in the potential for distributing the story in context of the overall project. More information about the original exhibition can be found here:

What prompted your interest in writing the manuscript if getting it published was somewhat of an accident? I am interested in understanding collective fantasy via the obscure, rather than the popular. I wanted to write a love story that was formulaic, but included anecdotes of my own life, to see if my experiences could be of value, commercially, to the paperback romance industry. The rejection of the manuscript revealed something about prescriptive desire and the hearts of the Midwestern women who fuel the paperback romance business. I learned, for example, that sexually transmitted diseases are considered a "turn off," within the Romance genre.

Where were you when you received the offer for the book to be published? I was at the opening of the exhibition in which the rejection letters were being shown. Ellen made a verbal offer to publish it, but I immediately declined, concerned as I was that the project stay true to its original intention of exploring failed literature within the mainstream commercial publishing world. It became clear quickly, however, that publishing the project independently could begin a new chapter. I am interested now in monitoring the book's success within public libraries. In this context readers can seek out the narrative without financial commitment.

Who was the first person you told about the book deal? I told my brother as we were heading to the show's after party. When Ellen sent me the contract, I sat down with my whole family and we reviewed it together. We had a long discussion about whether or not it was the right direction for the project. This was not a typical case of dreams coming true: I had never before imagined myself as a novelist. I'm a sculptor! But then I began to see the potential for the novel to be a sculpture, and that encouraged me to move forward with it.

How long did it take to finish the first draft? Because of our production schedule, I had only two months to write the first draft.

How many revisions did you write? Two.

Who read your drafts? Ellen edited the novel. Jennifer Tobias, art librarian extraordinaire and the book's critical essayist, provided a "library realness" edit. This involved fact checking things like whether or not it was structurally feasible that the steel cantilever shelving in the Minneapolis Public Library could hold the weight of a fornicating couple. My brother, who is an art writer and curator, also contributed an overall edit.

How did you decide which comments were important and which you didn't need to heed? I wanted to preserve the true character of the first three chapters—the proposal that I sent to the Slush pile—so that there could be transparency in terms of what they rejected. It was pretty rough stuff, though, so we had to compromise at times and edit those pages into more polished fiction.

Has your philosophy on getting published changed? Would you do anything differently now? I don't know if I would do anything differently. I believe the narrative is successful in preserving the raw vulnerability of offering this story up for public consumption, failing, and finding an outlet for more precisely judging it's potential relevance. There isn't just one moment in the publishing process when a writer can be rejected. If your book gets published, but no one reads it, that's another kind of heartbreak.

What words of advice would you give to a writer on the journey toward publication? Failure is funnier than success, and more romantic.
I love that rejection is incorporated into Julia's publication story as a positive force! That's good stuff. Go here to buy a copy of Julia's fascinating book today.


Anonymous said...

I don't get why romance publishers would ban sexually transmitted diseases from their pages. It would be really great if someone brought that old arcane genre into the 21st Century. I would love a character in a romance who dealt with the same problems I deal with, but still found love in the end. What's a little herpes between author and reader? It makes me realize that many mainstream publishers is really just out of the loop in general. I love the way this book looks. I am going to buy a copy -- or order it through my local library. Cool to see it on this blog.

Writer, Rejected said...

Romance is a genre that has benefited greatly from blogs and blogging, hasn't it? There seems to be a lot out there, driven by a big, public community of romance bloggers.

Anonymous said...

What would be sexy to me is an Uptight Librarian. Have you noticed that libraries have become indistinguishable from shopping malls in the way that people behave? I see this at every library I go to. Cell phones ringing, people talking in normal and even loud voices, latchkey kids use it as their unsupervised hangout place (especially in the doorways where they don't make room to let you walk by). Every time I hear people shouting or see a group of kids carrying on at one of their "party tables" I wonder, what the heck are the librarians doing???

Anonymous said...

A stern librarian with half glasses, who won't let you speak: that's sexy.

Kae and Jon said...

The cardinal rule seems to be that protagonists in romance novels be "likable." We have not encountered the bias against STDs, but would not be surprised if it exists, especially with the very formulaic romances. More sophisticated "women's fiction" would certainly have room for the STD-ridden protagonist.

Anonymous said...

I'm glad to hear it! I didn't really want to think that romance was so arcane. Cool, W,R, that you have some blogging literary agents commenting on your blog now. What do you call them again...bliterary agents?

These guys look interesting.

Anonymous said...

I read it. The writing was awful.