Rejection Pep Talk by Mary J Dressel
Need a pep talk? Go here.
A vast public collection of real-life rejection
Need a pep talk? Go here.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
8:36 AM
10
comments
Labels earnest
More archival rejections reveal that our Miss Horlbeck left behind a scrapbook of 138 rejections letters received between 1933 and 1937. Ladies and Germs, she was the foremother of this very blog. We have found our LROD leader.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
7:26 AM
1 comments
Have you heard of the lit journal Electric Literature? I hadn't. But I became interested when blogger Roxane Gay (editor of PANK) dressed them down here for literary arrogance.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
7:15 AM
5
comments
Labels earnest
From the mailbag today is the writer of the MIT Sloan Management Review rejection presented below. Think of this as a reminder that it's tough to put your baby out in the world no matter the field -- even business writing. Says the reject excitedly via an email, "The editor actually took the time to personalize this rejection making me feel like a professional rather than objectified. I couldn't believe it! Good relations, if you ask me. I'd be happy to be rejected by them again (but more happy to be accepted, admittedly)." Note how many times the word "paper" is used the first paragraph; looks like some editing of the rejection letter might be in order):
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
6:54 AM
0
comments
Labels earnest
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
11:29 AM
0
comments
Labels famous
Cloud of Witness Blog recaps the 24 rejections John Grisham received for his book A Time to Kill. Reports the blogger from an old interview of Grisham's: "The first dozen publishing companies and about the same number of agents all sent their regrets. Through it all, though, Grisham said he never got depressed. “I never thought of quitting. My attitude was: ‘What the heck, let’s have some fun.’
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
7:14 AM
6
comments
Labels famous
Is it still news a couple days later if it still shocks the crap out of you? Henry Louis Gates Jr., author of Colored People (and he wasn't kidding), arrested in his own home? I think it is still newsworthy. What's the matter with people anyway?
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
7:33 PM
1 comments
Labels famous
I guess it's all the rage to reject via multiple choice these days. Similar to this bit of fun, which we foolishly once thought was just a joke.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
6:50 AM
4
comments
Labels strange
This rejection is from the archives of 1936. Apparently the Real America ("The Outspoken Magazine") was once so outspoken as to leave out the noun in the customary noun/verb syntactical formulation known as the complete sentence. I kind of like it though, as it certainly allows the editor to evade responsibility, similar to how Daddy George Bush delivered his speeches. No "I" necessary! "Enjoyed reading....Suggest you try." Very cordial and removed. Also, I wonder if the comment in the top right corner is the name of Miss Horlbeck's story, or a description of her general outlook for getting published.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
9:08 AM
3
comments
Coffee House Press is only a demitasse, very small. So, there's just no room for your manuscript. They suggest you try another publishing house; maybe Maxwell House. That ought to wake you up in the morning!
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
7:33 AM
0
comments
Labels earnest
This dude's (real or fictionalized) blog entry about film festival rejection made me laugh. Here's a highlight: "I hate you. I hate the characters in your film. I hate your f--king film! I watched your protagonist and his lover suffer together through tremendous odds–and ultimately find love. WTF? Why can't I find love? " I liked the photo so much o I stole it and posted it here. Funny.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
6:58 AM
0
comments
Labels what the google?
I want to be a fake librarian at this (underground) library! Listen to this: “Writers, publishers, bookmaker, or booklover of any stripe who has recently finished writing a book, has published a book in the past year, or just feels like taking out some aggression on a publication of your choice” will be invited to hoist their materials into a four-foot catapult to be launched into the street. There will be a shredder where you can shred rejection letters. Debutantes will parade around with the CUL's new artist-designed submission boxes, which will be placed around the city for donations. Come one, come all, there’ll be prizes, there’ll be raffles, there’ll be a catapult! It’s free and open for all ages."
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
6:59 AM
0
comments
Labels exemplary
According to the Guardian, even the sometimes incoherent scratchings of the dead are more likely to get published than you are. Mover over literary writers of 2009, here come the hot new writers: Vladmir Nabokov, Graham Greene, Ernest Hemingway. This depressing news is brought to you via Scott Jagow's Scratch Pad on American Public Media.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
6:26 AM
0
comments
Labels famous
That happy little website entitled Guide To Literary Agents has a feature called "How I Got My Agent." I think it would be more interesting if there were one entitled, "I Was A Bad Secret Agent," or "How & Why I Fired My Agent," but I'm just stupidly curious that way. If anyone wants to post on the latter topic, please feel free.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
6:59 AM
3
comments
Labels earnest
While I was reading this article, "You Can't Win if You Don't Play," about literary Rejection by writer David Hunter, I was struck by the fact that in all my years blogging this tired topic I'd never heard the tidbit that Truman Capote claimed never to have received a rejection slip. Ever. I looked up an article in the Harvard Crimson from 1958 entitled "Cocktails with Truman Capote" by John D. Leonard stating the following: Capote never received a rejection slip. He peddled his first story to Storybook magazine when he was seventeen, "and I've sold everything since. Of course, I'm not very prolific. I've only written a total of twenty stories in all, and I spend up to five months on one short story. If it were rejected then, that would really be a disaster."
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
10:54 AM
2
comments
Labels famous
Grand River and Joy, named after a landmark intersection in Detroit, follows Harry Levine through the intersections of his life and the history of his city. It's a work of fiction set in a world that is anything but fictional, a novel about the intersections between races, classes, and religions exploding during the long, hot summers of Detroit in the 1960s. For more information and to buy the book, visit: http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=364373 or http://www.susanmesser.net/
When did you start writing the book? Grand River and Joy began as a short story—one of the first I wrote in my quest to become a writer. I took the story to a workshop and got some powerful responses, but it never got published, and I began to feel that I hadn’t quite told it “right.” I put it away for many years until one day, I was thrashing about, trying to decide what I wanted to work on next, and I remembered this story. So many years later, I wondered, having grown significantly as a writer, what might I make of it? I changed the narrative structure considerably, introduced new scenes and plot elements, and submitted it to a competition. Around that time, I’d also begun to think that the story had novelistic potential—with all its socioeconomic themes. I’d applied to and been accepted at an artists’ colony, and my plan was to go there to start the novel. That was about four years ago. By the way, the story won first place in the competition, and I was invited to Washington DC, where the competition sponsor was located, for an award celebration and reading. This certainly seemed to validate my intentions.
How long did it take to finish the first draft? It’s hard for me at this point to distinguish between drafts or recall how long any one of them took to write. But at about the two-year mark, I started to think I was ready to look for an agent.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
7:15 AM
1 comments
Labels victory over rejection
According to the Encyclopedia Britannica Blog (where ideas matter), T.S. Eliot rejected George Orwell's Animal Farm 65 years ago today. Eliot, moonlighting as an editor at Faber & Faber, told the political-satire guru that his manuscript was not up to the publishing house's literary standards, hastening to say, however, that “we have no conviction . . . that this is the right point of view from which to criticise the political situation at the present time.” Isn't it so like a rejecting editor to have no conviction? Makes me feel better.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
9:49 AM
5
comments
Labels famous

Remember the Virginia Quarterly Review incident, followed by the sort-of apology and literary cat fight? Yeah...me too. Those were some interesting moments.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
7:55 AM
0
comments
Labels boring
A publisher accidentally sent Susan Messer private notes about a manuscript. Once she recovered from her devastation, she decided to turn the hurtful words into a performance piece entitled, "Rejection Rhumba." The sound is muffled, but you get the idea.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
7:03 AM
4
comments
Labels just plain crappy
From the mail bag today, an anonymous(e) writes to tell about a rejection received from Gargoyle, noting that the literary magazine is apparently edited by a gargoyle: I sent a story to Gargoyle yesterday, (the story features a lesbian protagonist) and got this reply this morning. "I want more about the women and their sexual encounter. All the backstory just took the NOW out of it for me. I'd rethink this angle." (Do you think by "took the NOW out" he meant "kept me from climaxing"?) Perhaps there are a few other mags he should consider if he wants all sex, no context.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
12:30 PM
7
comments
Nothing like seeing a good writer make it into print with an intriguing story. James Hannaham's first novel, God Says No, is the story of a young black Christian struggling with desire and belief, with his love for his wife, and his appetite for other men, told in a singular, emotional voice. Driven by desperation and religious visions, the path that narrator Gary Gray takes gives a riveting picture of how life can be lived. Perhaps you will like to pick it up in a bookstore, purchase it, and read it, yes? In the meantime, here's a good victory-over-rejection story:
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
11:13 AM
0
comments
Labels victory over rejection
What Will Become of HarperCollins’ Sarah Palin Memoir? (Hint: still being published instead of yours.)
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
7:32 AM
2
comments
Labels famous
News flash: Economic downturn cited in literary rejection letter. You had to know it was coming, right? Here's one posted by Write Meg! from an anonymous literary agent: "Thank you for considering us, but due to the economy, we are reluctant to represent women’s fiction at this time." That's quite a statement.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
1:24 PM
6
comments
Labels misguided
In case you are sitting around wondering about how your own personal literary performance (whatever that means) matches up, the poetess Donna Quesinberry has a serious exploration for you on the topic over at the examiner.com in an article called Rating Personal Literary Performance. Here's a highlight: "So how do you rate your literary performance? By the progression you make, without stress, without writer's block, without angst. If you are writing, publishing, and writing again-you are successful. If you haven't been published yet, you don't stress, you access your submission market, you re-submit. In other words, you continue to write and work with a rejection being something to put in your journal and then let go of. Don't hold onto negativity. That is a barrier to success." Bah.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
7:40 AM
3
comments
Labels earnest
CBSnews in Canada asks the following question: Could the next great novel be written on a cell phone? I learned so many astonishing things from this article, such as (1) the melodramatic cellphone novel If You by "Rin" is considered a best-seller, even though it features sentences like this one: "I'm short, I'm stupid, I'm not pretty, I'm rubbish, and I've got no dreams." (2) Another melodramatic cellphone bestseller called Love Sky by Mika was made into a movie, and (3) St. Martin's Press offered a three-"book" deal to a U.S. author Saoirse Redgrave who won a contest and "micro-published" on a website titled textnovel which looks like child's vomit. I feel educated...and scared.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
6:40 AM
11
comments
Labels strange
The New York Times recently ran an article ("Rethinking Gender Bias in Theater") reporting on an academic study that found discrimination in the theater community against female playwrights. I'm not sure why this would be a shock to anybody: you can count on one hand plays by women that make it to the big stage, and certainly the people affected are well aware of the problem. But it appears to be causing quite a stir. Other articles on the topic appear in Bloomberg, Critical Difference Blog, New York Magazine, and Salon.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
11:55 AM
0
comments
Labels just plain crappy
Self Publishing Review has an article offering practical advice about traditional rejection, entitled: Rejection...a Pain in the What? Self-serving? Maybe. Still, here is a highlight: In October 2003, a UCLA-led team of psychologists reported the results of their study on “rejection” and its effects on the brain. Conventional wisdom has long held that rejection is an emotion that is technically unquantifiable. However, the UCLA-led team proved otherwise. They concluded that “rejection” does, in fact, register in the brain! And further, that the mechanism by which this occurs is identical to the experience of physical pain!
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
8:08 AM
1 comments
Labels rejection advice

This one says: Dear Contestant: Thank you for entering the eighth "On the Premises" short story contest. Ten stories were selected as finalists. We're sorry to have to inform you that yours was not among them. The ninth short story contest will begin the same day our eighth issue is published July 13th, or thereabouts). Look for it, and keep on writing! Wonder how much the entry fee is each year. It's a good racket, if you can get people to pay.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
6:41 AM
1 comments
Labels misguided

This out-to-lunch rejection is long and involved with many choices, but the important part is circled. Click to enlarge and read the entire range of possible reasons for rejection. It's quite amusing.
Posted by
Writer, Rejected
at
5:38 AM
6
comments
Labels strange